Hide this comment
By on 2/7/2010 2:50 PM ()Reply
Hide this comment

I know; I submitted it to /.

I wish I could figure out how to get it added to the front page here. I'm sure there are a lot of folks who come to this site that would love to read this interview.

By on 2/7/2010 7:14 PM ()Reply
Hide this comment

good idea. Try sending an email to os #at# jjbresearch.org, and put "HubFS EMAIL" in the subject line.

I got this info from here.

By on 2/7/2010 7:25 PM ()Reply
Hide this comment

Thanks; wish I had thought to search for that. :-) I was looking on the site for some sort of link to submit it.

--

Onorio

By on 2/8/2010 6:46 AM ()Reply
Hide this comment

Thanks, heaps, for the link. Highly recommended!

Very good for understanding where F# has come from, and where it's going. I liked the acknowledgement to Haskell for some of the parts which differentiate F# from OCaml.

This was my favourite quote...

Of course, not all programs end up so beautiful [as the scientific programs]. It’s very important

that we tackle “programming in the large as well”. That’s what the

object-oriented features of F# are for.

This is very much where I'm headed, and struggling. I first picked up F# for the beauty of the algorithmic fragments, but now I'm trying to find some leverage for it in the behometh of .Net, applying it in frameworks such as ASP.NET MVC, and SharePoint.

By on 2/6/2010 2:33 PM ()Reply
Hide this comment

I am reminded of a quip from Djkstra, to the effect that scientific and technical programs are the easiest. I think he wrote that c1970 - how much more true is it now!

By on 2/6/2010 2:38 PM ()Reply
IntelliFactory Offices Copyright (c) 2011-2012 IntelliFactory. All rights reserved.
Home | Products | Consulting | Trainings | Blogs | Jobs | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Cookie Policy
Built with WebSharper

Logging in...